– Niels Bohr Institute - University of Copenhagen

Forward this page to a friend Resize Print Bookmark and Share

Niels Bohr Institute > Staff

Publication bias and the canonization of false facts

Publication: Research - peer-reviewJournal article

Documents

  • eLife paper

    Final published version, 2 MB, PDF-document

Silas Boye Nissen, Tali Magidson, Kevin Gross, Carl T Bergstrom

Science is facing a "replication crisis" in which many experimental findings cannot be replicated and are likely to be false. Does this imply that many scientific facts are false as well? To find out, we explore the process by which a claim becomes fact. We model the community's confidence in a claim as a Markov process with successive published results shifting the degree of belief. Publication bias in favor of positive findings influences the distribution of published results. We find that unless a sufficient fraction of negative results are published, false claims frequently can become canonized as fact. Data-dredging, p-hacking, and similar behaviors exacerbate the problem. Should negative results become easier to publish as a claim approaches acceptance as a fact, however, true and false claims would be more readily distinguished. To the degree that the model reflects the real world, there may be serious concerns about the validity of purported facts in some disciplines.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere21451
JournaleLife
Volume5
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
ISSN2050-084X
DOIs
StatePublished - 20 Dec 2016

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk


No data available

ID: 170343523