Cost-benefit of limited isolation and testing in COVID-19 mitigation

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Cost-benefit of limited isolation and testing in COVID-19 mitigation. / Eilersen, Andreas; Sneppen, Kim.

In: Scientific Reports, Vol. 10, No. 1, 18543, 29.10.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Eilersen, A & Sneppen, K 2020, 'Cost-benefit of limited isolation and testing in COVID-19 mitigation', Scientific Reports, vol. 10, no. 1, 18543. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75640-2

APA

Eilersen, A., & Sneppen, K. (2020). Cost-benefit of limited isolation and testing in COVID-19 mitigation. Scientific Reports, 10(1), [18543]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75640-2

Vancouver

Eilersen A, Sneppen K. Cost-benefit of limited isolation and testing in COVID-19 mitigation. Scientific Reports. 2020 Oct 29;10(1). 18543. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75640-2

Author

Eilersen, Andreas ; Sneppen, Kim. / Cost-benefit of limited isolation and testing in COVID-19 mitigation. In: Scientific Reports. 2020 ; Vol. 10, No. 1.

Bibtex

@article{df7587b1c92041f68fee79e63b307b8a,
title = "Cost-benefit of limited isolation and testing in COVID-19 mitigation",
abstract = "The international community has been put in an unprecedented situation by the COVID-19 pandemic. Creating models to describe and quantify alternative mitigation strategies becomes increasingly urgent. In this study, we propose an agent-based model of disease transmission in a society divided into closely connected families, workplaces, and social groups. This allows us to discuss mitigation strategies, including targeted quarantine measures. We find that workplace and more diffuse social contacts are roughly equally important to disease spread, and that an effective lockdown must target both. We examine the cost-benefit of replacing a lockdown with tracing and quarantining contacts of the infected. Quarantine can contribute substantially to mitigation, even if it has short duration and is done within households. When reopening society, testing and quarantining is a strategy that is much cheaper in terms of lost workdays than a long lockdown. A targeted quarantine strategy is quite efficient with only 5 days of quarantine, and its effect increases when testing is more widespread.",
keywords = "SPREAD",
author = "Andreas Eilersen and Kim Sneppen",
year = "2020",
month = oct,
day = "29",
doi = "10.1038/s41598-020-75640-2",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "Scientific Reports",
issn = "2045-2322",
publisher = "nature publishing group",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cost-benefit of limited isolation and testing in COVID-19 mitigation

AU - Eilersen, Andreas

AU - Sneppen, Kim

PY - 2020/10/29

Y1 - 2020/10/29

N2 - The international community has been put in an unprecedented situation by the COVID-19 pandemic. Creating models to describe and quantify alternative mitigation strategies becomes increasingly urgent. In this study, we propose an agent-based model of disease transmission in a society divided into closely connected families, workplaces, and social groups. This allows us to discuss mitigation strategies, including targeted quarantine measures. We find that workplace and more diffuse social contacts are roughly equally important to disease spread, and that an effective lockdown must target both. We examine the cost-benefit of replacing a lockdown with tracing and quarantining contacts of the infected. Quarantine can contribute substantially to mitigation, even if it has short duration and is done within households. When reopening society, testing and quarantining is a strategy that is much cheaper in terms of lost workdays than a long lockdown. A targeted quarantine strategy is quite efficient with only 5 days of quarantine, and its effect increases when testing is more widespread.

AB - The international community has been put in an unprecedented situation by the COVID-19 pandemic. Creating models to describe and quantify alternative mitigation strategies becomes increasingly urgent. In this study, we propose an agent-based model of disease transmission in a society divided into closely connected families, workplaces, and social groups. This allows us to discuss mitigation strategies, including targeted quarantine measures. We find that workplace and more diffuse social contacts are roughly equally important to disease spread, and that an effective lockdown must target both. We examine the cost-benefit of replacing a lockdown with tracing and quarantining contacts of the infected. Quarantine can contribute substantially to mitigation, even if it has short duration and is done within households. When reopening society, testing and quarantining is a strategy that is much cheaper in terms of lost workdays than a long lockdown. A targeted quarantine strategy is quite efficient with only 5 days of quarantine, and its effect increases when testing is more widespread.

KW - SPREAD

U2 - 10.1038/s41598-020-75640-2

DO - 10.1038/s41598-020-75640-2

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33122753

VL - 10

JO - Scientific Reports

JF - Scientific Reports

SN - 2045-2322

IS - 1

M1 - 18543

ER -

ID: 252038919