Strong crustal seismic anisotropy in the Kalahari Craton based on Receiver Functions

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKonferenceabstrakt i tidsskriftForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Strong crustal seismic anisotropy in the Kalahari Craton based on Receiver Functions. / Thybo, Hans; Soliman, Mohammad Youssof Ahmad; Artemieva, Irina.

I: Geophysical Research Abstracts, Bind 17, 8916, 04.2015.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKonferenceabstrakt i tidsskriftForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Thybo, H, Soliman, MYA & Artemieva, I 2015, 'Strong crustal seismic anisotropy in the Kalahari Craton based on Receiver Functions', Geophysical Research Abstracts, bind 17, 8916.

APA

Thybo, H., Soliman, M. Y. A., & Artemieva, I. (2015). Strong crustal seismic anisotropy in the Kalahari Craton based on Receiver Functions. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 17, [8916].

Vancouver

Thybo H, Soliman MYA, Artemieva I. Strong crustal seismic anisotropy in the Kalahari Craton based on Receiver Functions. Geophysical Research Abstracts. 2015 apr.;17. 8916.

Author

Thybo, Hans ; Soliman, Mohammad Youssof Ahmad ; Artemieva, Irina. / Strong crustal seismic anisotropy in the Kalahari Craton based on Receiver Functions. I: Geophysical Research Abstracts. 2015 ; Bind 17.

Bibtex

@article{24fc94b1103649cb84b941cb6b8adaba,
title = "Strong crustal seismic anisotropy in the Kalahari Craton based on Receiver Functions",
abstract = "Earlier seismic studies of the Kalahari Craton in southern Africa infer deformation of upper mantle by flow with fast direction of seismic anisotropy being parallel to present plate motion, and/or report anisotropy frozen into the lithospheric mantle. We present evidence for very strong seismic anisotropy in the crust of the Kalahari craton, which is 30-40% of the total anisotropy as measured by SKS splitting. Our analysis is based on calculation of receiver functions for the data from the SASE experiment which shows strong splitting between the SV and SH components. The direction of the fast axes is uniform within tectonic units and parallel to orogenic strike in the Limpopo and Cape fold belts. It is further parallel to the strike of major dyke swarms which indicates that a large part of the observed anisotropy is controlled by lithosphere fabrics and macroscopic effects. The directions of the fast axes for the crustal anisotropy are parallel to the general directions determined from SKS splitting, although the directions from our analysis of receiver functions is more homogeneous than for SKS splitting. This analysis indicates parallel fast axes in the crust and in the mantle, which suggests that the crust and lithospheric mantle may have been coupled since cratonisation. If so, the apparent match between mantle anisotropy and the present plate motion is coincidental.",
author = "Hans Thybo and Soliman, {Mohammad Youssof Ahmad} and Irina Artemieva",
year = "2015",
month = apr,
language = "English",
volume = "17",
journal = "Geophysical Research Abstracts",
issn = "1607-7962",
publisher = "Copernicus GmbH",
note = "EGU General Assembly 2015 ; Conference date: 12-04-2015 Through 17-04-2015",

}

RIS

TY - ABST

T1 - Strong crustal seismic anisotropy in the Kalahari Craton based on Receiver Functions

AU - Thybo, Hans

AU - Soliman, Mohammad Youssof Ahmad

AU - Artemieva, Irina

PY - 2015/4

Y1 - 2015/4

N2 - Earlier seismic studies of the Kalahari Craton in southern Africa infer deformation of upper mantle by flow with fast direction of seismic anisotropy being parallel to present plate motion, and/or report anisotropy frozen into the lithospheric mantle. We present evidence for very strong seismic anisotropy in the crust of the Kalahari craton, which is 30-40% of the total anisotropy as measured by SKS splitting. Our analysis is based on calculation of receiver functions for the data from the SASE experiment which shows strong splitting between the SV and SH components. The direction of the fast axes is uniform within tectonic units and parallel to orogenic strike in the Limpopo and Cape fold belts. It is further parallel to the strike of major dyke swarms which indicates that a large part of the observed anisotropy is controlled by lithosphere fabrics and macroscopic effects. The directions of the fast axes for the crustal anisotropy are parallel to the general directions determined from SKS splitting, although the directions from our analysis of receiver functions is more homogeneous than for SKS splitting. This analysis indicates parallel fast axes in the crust and in the mantle, which suggests that the crust and lithospheric mantle may have been coupled since cratonisation. If so, the apparent match between mantle anisotropy and the present plate motion is coincidental.

AB - Earlier seismic studies of the Kalahari Craton in southern Africa infer deformation of upper mantle by flow with fast direction of seismic anisotropy being parallel to present plate motion, and/or report anisotropy frozen into the lithospheric mantle. We present evidence for very strong seismic anisotropy in the crust of the Kalahari craton, which is 30-40% of the total anisotropy as measured by SKS splitting. Our analysis is based on calculation of receiver functions for the data from the SASE experiment which shows strong splitting between the SV and SH components. The direction of the fast axes is uniform within tectonic units and parallel to orogenic strike in the Limpopo and Cape fold belts. It is further parallel to the strike of major dyke swarms which indicates that a large part of the observed anisotropy is controlled by lithosphere fabrics and macroscopic effects. The directions of the fast axes for the crustal anisotropy are parallel to the general directions determined from SKS splitting, although the directions from our analysis of receiver functions is more homogeneous than for SKS splitting. This analysis indicates parallel fast axes in the crust and in the mantle, which suggests that the crust and lithospheric mantle may have been coupled since cratonisation. If so, the apparent match between mantle anisotropy and the present plate motion is coincidental.

M3 - Conference abstract in journal

VL - 17

JO - Geophysical Research Abstracts

JF - Geophysical Research Abstracts

SN - 1607-7962

M1 - 8916

T2 - EGU General Assembly 2015

Y2 - 12 April 2015 through 17 April 2015

ER -

ID: 140443376